Skip to main content



Wednesday, February 5, 2020 

SGMF (Society for Gas as Marine Fuel) and SEALNG have noted the draft report 'The climate implications of using LNG as a marine fuel' produced by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT).

The organisations point out that they were not contacted prior to the release – and need some time to review the report in depth – but the immediate comments are related to the assumptions and methodologies used and the lack of direct input from the engine manufacturers.

A statemeant published by SEA/LNG said: "We stand by the results of the thinkstep study published in April 2019. The study has been widely recognised as the most comprehensive analysis undertaken to date on the lifecycle GHG emissions of LNG as a marine fuel compared with current and post-2020 conventional marine fuels. The analysis was based on the latest primary data available from the main marine engine manufacturers, namely; Caterpillar MaK, Caterpillar Solar Turbines, GE Aviation, MAN Energy Solutions, MTU Friedrichshafen, Winterthur Gas & Diesel (WinGD) and Wärtsilä. On the fuel supply chains, data from internationally recognised lifecycle databases was supplemented with information from ExxonMobil, Shell and Total. The study assessed the supply and use of LNG as a marine fuel according to ISO standards. Finally, to ensure objectivity, it was peer-reviewed by leading academics from key institutions in France, Germany, Japan and the USA. Previous critical comments towards the Thinkstep study were comprehensively addressed last autumn (see here) and these points remain valid, post the publication of the ICCT report.

"With regard to assumptions – the ICCT findings are based on analysis of the 20-year global warming potential (GWP20) data, rather than the more commonly used 100-year (GWP100) metric.  Whilst there are many metrics available to quantify climate change that are discussed by scientists GWP100 is considered the best practice and default metric, in part because it is compulsory for UNFCC national GHG inventory reporting. 

"We note that the balance of LNG shipping numbers quoted in the study are heavily biased towards coastal vessels.  Aside from existing LNG carriers, they do not include many deep-sea ocean vessels powered by large slow-speed two-stroke engines, and it is these vessels that make up most of the global fleet tonnage and offer the greatest potential for reductions in GHG emissions through the use of LNG as a marine fuel.

The statement says that in January 2020 there were three compliant fuel solutions available. LNG is one, and is both available and scalable. Use of LNG will reduce GHG emissions from marine transportation. It will further provide a strong foundation towards a zero-emissions shipping industry through the use of liquefied biomethane (LBM) and liquefied synthetic methane (LSM), as well as initiating the development of much longer-term alternative fuel solutions that are not yet available or feasible.

Reader Comments (0)

There are currently no comments on this article. Why not be the first and leave your thoughts below.

Leave Your Comment

Please keep your comment on topic, any inappropriate comments may be removed.

Return to index